This week we continue our series on early historic ceramics
often recovered on archaeological sites and their significance in the historic
and archaeological record. Past posts have discussed Jackfield (1745-1790) and Scratch
blue (1744-1775) ceramics. Colonial ceramics of the 17th & 18th
century are typically divided into three categories: Earthenware, Stoneware and
Porcelain. These categories are derived from the clays used in manufacture as
well as the firing techniques. Scratch blue is a salt-glazed stoneware, as its
name implies it is a harder, more durable ceramic. The clay body is vitrified
meaning non-porous, due in part to firing it between 1200-1300 degrees Celsius.
Earthenware ceramics |
Earthenware ceramics
are fired at lower temperatures in the range of 900-1050 degrees Celsius. This
lower firing means that the vessel doesn’t naturally hold liquids, and required
a glaze be applied to either the interior or exterior surface for it to hold
liquids. Not all vessels were glazed, flowerpots are an example of unglazed
earthenware. This category of pottery was relatively easy and inexpensive to
produce, making this the most prolific of the ceramic types of the period.
Porcelain required white clays that could withstand kiln temperatures over 1300
degrees Celsius. They were more difficult to produce and their delicate nature
meant they were not as commonly used in working class households. Archaeologists
rely on ceramics not only as a tool for dating archaeological sites and
features, but also to examine socio-economic conditions and consumer behavior.
For many people a broken piece of pottery is viewed as rubbish, for an
archaeologist it can contain a wealth of information and lead to an
understanding and appreciation for the occupants of the site or household, and
the potter who produced the ware.
Fragments of 18th
century pottery recovered at Fort Hunter (36Da159) |
Various forms of combed slipware from the collections of The State Museum of Pennsylvania |
Image of slipware vessel, comb slip decoration with dot
pattern on rim. Collections of The State Museum, Archaeology |
Samuel Malkin plates, close-up of initials S and M on either side of dot |
Two additional vessels reconstructed from the well provide a
more iconic image of these early potters and demonstrates the social and
cultural artistry often employed by these skilled craftsmen. The design of
these vessels described as “sunfaces” are attributed to Samuel Malkin based on
research by David Orr (personal communication). Dr. Orr, retired Senior
Regional Archaeologist for the Northeast Region of the National Park Service,
has examined multiple vessels created by Malkin and believes these to be among
his creations. Orr has suggested possible religious connotations depicted by
the celestial suns and the multiple examples of biblical phrases on other
Malkin vessels. It’s doubtful we will ever know why these faces were chosen or
their symbolism for the consumer, but the craftsmanship of Samuel Malkin nearly
300 years ago is preserved in those broken pieces of pottery allowing future
generations to appreciate and understand his story.
1
Probable S. Malkin plate on display at The State Museum of Pennsylvania |
2 Sunface plate in collections of The State Museum |
We hope you will continue to follow our blog to learn more
about the incredible ceramics that have been recovered by archaeologists from
across the Commonwealth. The preservation of these objects provides a personal
glimpse into the lives of early colonists and of the potters who produced them.
German immigrants who became potters in Philadelphia, Lancaster and York
developed their methods and refined the clay available locally to produce
ceramics that would replace those from Europe and led the way for many artisan
crafts throughout the colony.
Advancements in science have allowed archaeologists to
analyze clay sources and trace them to regions and in some cases potters. Archaeologists have the unique ability of
finding the stories of everyday life through the evidence of the past- even if
it is only a broken piece of pottery.
Please visit our website for additional objects from our
collections at; https://www.phmc.pa.gov/Museums/Online-Collection/Pages/default.aspx
For additional examples of Samuel Malkin pottery visit the
on-line collection of the British Museum;
https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/term/BIOG74295
Bibliography
Dean, Darron. "A Slipware Dish by Samuel Malkin: An
Analysis of Vernacular Design." Journal of Design History 7,
no. 3 (1994): 153-67. Accessed February 25, 2021.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1316113.
Hunter, Robert. 2003. Ceramics in America 2003.
Milwaukee, Wis: Chipstone Foundation. Samuel Malkin in Philadelphia: A
remarkable Slipware Assemblage. David G. Orr
Noël Hume, Ivor. 1970. A Guide to Artifacts of Colonial
America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf
No comments:
Post a Comment