Somerset County (So) is dark blue third county from bottom left |
Somerset County:
Birthplace of the Monongahela Culture Concept
By Dr. Bernard K. Means, Director of the Virtual Curation Laboratory
at
Virginia Commonwealth University
Virginia Commonwealth University
This week’s journey by county through
the archaeology of Pennsylvania takes us to southwestern Pennsylvania and
Somerset County. Somerset County falls
primarily within the Allegheny Mountain Section of the Appalachian Plateau
Province, although a small portion of southeastern Somerset County falls into
the Allegheny Mountain Section of the Valley and Ridge Province. Overall, the
topography of Somerset County is rugged and mountainous. One mountain in the
county has the highest elevation in Pennsylvania at 3213 feet.
Somerset County is drained by the
Youghiogheny and Casselman Rivers, which form a portion of the headwaters of
the Ohio River Drainage. The Raystown
Branch of the Juniata River—part of the Susquehanna River Drainage—originates
in Somerset County, as do several headwaters of the Potomac River. As such,
this region’s geographic placement indicates that it potentially served as a
crossroads between cultural developments that occurred in different parts of
the Northeast and Middle Atlantic regions. The majority of archaeological sites
in Somerset County occur on or adjacent to the extensive areas of floodplain
near Meyersdale and Confluence.
Two American Indian trails, Nemacolin's
Path and the Turkeyfoot Path, are known to have crossed through Somerset
County. Nemacolin's Path ran from Wills
Creek near Cumberland, Maryland, to the confluence of Redstone Creek and the
Monongahela River. The Turkeyfoot Path
at the confluence of Wills Creek and the Potomac River near Cumberland,
Maryland and continued to Confluence, Pennsylvania. The interconnectedness of southwestern
Pennsylvania with the eastern portions of the state and with Maryland to the
south was clearly established by 1800 B.C., as evidenced by the distribution of
raw materials such as rhyolite and steatite.
By the Late Prehistoric period (A.D. 900 to 1600), these Native American
paths may have reached their peak usage.
A Clovis projectile point base excavated near Meyersdale, Pennsylvania
American Indian habitation of Somerset
County dates back to the Paleoindian period. Somerset County has one of the
denser concentrations of Paleoindian sites found in western Pennsylvania. Surface finds include a cluster of at least seven
Paleoindian fluted point discoveries located on the Casselman River near
Meyersdale in Somerset County, Pennsylvania. There is a relative scarcity of
recorded Early Archaic points in Somerset County and therefore few recognized
Early Archaic sites. Compliance investigations in the Meyersdale area uncovered
a handful of Early Archaic components based on diagnostic artifacts, largely
from non-stratified contexts. Similarly, recorded Middle Archaic sites are
rarer in Somerset County than other parts of Western Pennsylvania. However,
recent investigations in the Meyersdale area did encounter sites with Middle
Archaic diagnostic artifacts including LeCroy bifurcate projectile points.
Late Archaic populations in western
Pennsylvania are characterized as specialized hunters and gatherers
intensifying their use of specific resources, such as fish, and during this
period the initial domestication of eastern seed plants occurred. Base camps
were likely in floodplains and low terraces of high order streams. Otter Creek
and Brewerton notched points are the dominant Late Archaic projectile point
forms recovered in Somerset County. Late Archaic sites are well represented in
the vicinity of Meyersdale, with representative components at 26 sites in the
form of over 100 diagnostic points, including Brewerton Corner Notched, Eared
Notched, and Side Notched varieties, as well as to the Lamoka type. Sites with Late Archaic components in the
Meyersdale area are distributed across a wide variety of topographic settings,
including the floodplain/terrace systems of the Casselman River and tributary
streams, saddles, and lower slopes. This distribution of sites indicates
extensive utilization of the local landscape.
Late Archaic Brewerton Points from Meyersdale Transportation Project |
The Early Woodland period saw the
introduction of pottery to Somerset County, but otherwise settlement and
subsistence patterns continued relatively unchanged from the Archaic
period. Investigations in the Meyersdale
area recovered only ten sites with Early Woodland components, suggesting that
some Late Archaic diagnostics may have been used into this period. Middle
Woodland sites are also sparsely represented in Somerset County, perhaps for
the same reason. Late Woodland sites are better represented by diagnostic
projectile points, including Backstrum, Chesser Notched, and Jack's Reef
Pentagonal types.
One particularly intriguing Late Woodland site was excavated in the Meyersdale area. Analysis of data recovered in excavations conducted at The Field W-E site (36So220) revealed use of the site from the Late Archaic through the Late Woodland. During earlier occupation periods it was utilized as a short term camp site or bivouac. In the Middle Woodland to Late Woodland it is hypothesized that this site served as a periodic gathering place for surrounding hamlets. Two shallow trenches were identified and within each a series of postmolds, possibly fence or screen-like barriers. Analysis of remains recovered from two hearths revealed heavy seasonal use during the Middle and Late Woodland periods. This use of a site as a “vacant center” is consistent with settlement patterns observed elsewhere in the Ohio River Valley and central Pennsylvania, but was previously unrecognized in the region. No evidence for house remains were discovered as would characterize the subsequent Late Prehistoric period.
From upper left -Terminal Archaic-Early Woodland: Fishtail;, Middle Woodland : Snyders,
Bottom left Late
Woodland: Backstrum (3) Late Woodland: Madison (bottom far rt.)
One particularly intriguing Late Woodland site was excavated in the Meyersdale area. Analysis of data recovered in excavations conducted at The Field W-E site (36So220) revealed use of the site from the Late Archaic through the Late Woodland. During earlier occupation periods it was utilized as a short term camp site or bivouac. In the Middle Woodland to Late Woodland it is hypothesized that this site served as a periodic gathering place for surrounding hamlets. Two shallow trenches were identified and within each a series of postmolds, possibly fence or screen-like barriers. Analysis of remains recovered from two hearths revealed heavy seasonal use during the Middle and Late Woodland periods. This use of a site as a “vacant center” is consistent with settlement patterns observed elsewhere in the Ohio River Valley and central Pennsylvania, but was previously unrecognized in the region. No evidence for house remains were discovered as would characterize the subsequent Late Prehistoric period.
Drawing of a Monongahela village, courtesy of Laura J. Galke
The best documented sites in Somerset
County date to the Late Prehistoric period and are associated with the
Monongahela culture. The widespread
adoption of maize agriculture is often thought to have spurred people living in
scattered hamlets and other sites to join together in village communities
during the Late Prehistoric period.
Communities may also have gathered into compact village sites as a
response to cooling caused by the Little Ice Age. Monongahela villages in
Somerset County consisted of a ring of houses around an open central plaza and
were usually surrounded by a plaza. Some
Monongahela continued to live in hamlets even after the rise of village
communities, and several rockshelters dating to the Late Prehistoric period
have also been excavated. The last Monongahela village inhabited in Somerset
County, located near Meyersdale, is Peck 2 which dates to the early 1500s. The Monongahela
living here may have joined other communities further to the west.
When the first Europeans crossed into
what was to become Somerset County, refuge groups of the Iroquois, Mingoes,
Lenni-Lenape or Delaware, and Shawnee inhabited the area. Several major Native American trails that
crossed Somerset County were integral to European expansion into and through
Western Pennsylvania. The hostilities between Britain and France discouraged
settlement in the area of modern Somerset County. Thomas and Richard Penn, sons
of William Penn, purchased parts of Somerset County from American Indians after
the Treaty of Fort Stanwix was signed in 1768. Somerset County itself was
actually formed out of Bedford County on April 17, 1795. The increasing
population in the future county of Somerset was no longer willing to travel
long distances to register legal documents at county offices in Bedford.
In the early decades of the nineteenth
century, the newly formed Somerset County played an active role in the movement
of settlers to regions further west. Although many inhabitants of Somerset
County during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries were farmers, industrial
development in the vicinity of Meyersdale is particularly noteworthy. The
coming of the railroad in the mid-nineteenth century especially influenced the
growth of local businesses. During the twentieth century, industrial
development reached a peak and then a decline while the surrounding rural area
became fully integrated into industrial dairy and coal production. Historic
archaeological investigations in the Meyersdale area in particular document key
aspects of this transition.
Winter excavations at Peck 1, a Monongahela village site near Meyersdale
Somerset County has a rich history of
archaeological investigations. Major archaeological investigations in Somerset
County were initiated at the height of the Great Depression. Some leading
scholars at the time argued—incorrectly—that there had never been a substantial
aboriginal occupation of the region.
From 1934 to 1940, the New Deal-funded Somerset County Relief
Excavations undertook large-scale excavations of village sites to address this issue,
as well as to provide sufficient work to keep a crew of men continuously
employed. Local citizens interested in the County’s past helped guide the
project director, Edgar Augustine, to probable village site locations. One of these citizens was Flora Church, a
member of the Pennsylvania Historical Commission, and a prominent resident of
Meyersdale. Mary Butler developed the first formal definition of the
Monongahela Culture based on ring-shaped village sites excavated by these work
relief crews.
The Carnegie Museum of Natural
History, aided by avocational archaeologists—especially the Somerset County
Archaeological Society—documented and excavated a number of archaeological
sites in Somerset County. The most
notable of these was the excavation in the early 1970s of the Gnagey No. 3
site, which consisted of two overlapping Monongahela village components.
Excavations as part of the U.S. 219 Meyersdale Bypass project
Beginning in the 1990s, most
excavations in Somerset County have been driven by compliance-related studies,
most notably the U.S. 219 Meyersdale Bypass Project. The construction of a five-mile bypass around
the town of Meyersdale led to the investigation of over 60 archaeological
sites, with eight sites studied in extensive detail. Research efforts initiated during the U.S.
219 Meyersdale Bypass Project, but continued independently, have made extensive
use of curated collections of artifacts and field notes, especially those held
by the Archaeology Division of The State Museum of Pennsylvania. These research efforts of curated collections
have led to new theoretical and methodological insights into Monongahela
village settlements, a revised radiocarbon chronology for Somerset County, and
a reconsideration of the history of archaeological investigations—particularly
those associated with New Deal work relief crews. The importance of Somerset
County’s heritage is further realized by the application of cutting-edge 3D
artifact scanning technology of archaeological findings from the county.
3D model of a chunky stone from Fort Hill
We hope you have
enjoyed this journey into the archaeological heritage of Somerset County and
you are inspired to research the archaeology of this county through the
resources listed below, or seek out the archaeological heritage of your own
county through this web site. Many thanks to our repeat blogger, Dr. Bernard
Means, for his contribution to TWIPA.
References
Butler, Mary
1939 Three Archaeological Sites in Somerset
County, Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania
Historical Commission Bulletin 753.
Pennsylvania Historical Commission, Harrisburg.
Flint, Norman
1965 Geology and Mineral Resources of Southern
Somerset County, Pennsylvania.
Pennsylvania Geological Survey, Harrisburg.
George, Richard
1983
The
Gnagey Site and the Monongahela Occupation of the Somerset Plateau. Pennsylvania Archaeologist 53
(4):1-79.
Hart, John
1993 Monongahela Subsistence-Settlement Change:
The Late Prehistoric Period in the Lower Upper Ohio Valley. Journal of World Prehistory 7:71-120.
Means, Bernard K.
2002
The Later Prehistory of Meyersdale,
Pennsylvania, and Its Surroundings: An Overview. North American Archaeologist 23
(4):281-307.
2005
New Dates for New Deal Excavated
Monongahela Villages in Somerset County.
Pennsylvania Archaeologist 75 (1):49-61.
2007
Circular Villages of the Monongahela
Tradition. The University of Alabama
Press, Tuscaloosa.
2013
Archaeologist #.00000000000000000:
Edgar E. Augustine and New Deal Excavations in Somerset County,
Pennsylvania. In Shovel Ready:
Archaeology and Roosevelt's New Deal for America, edited by Bernard K.
Means, pp. 48-64. The University of
Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
Wallace, Paul
1993 Indian Paths of Pennsylvania. Originally published 1965. Pennsylvania
Historical and Museum Commission, Harrisburg.
Web sites:
New Deal archaeology in Somerset
County: http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/new_deal_archaeology/4671
Virtual Curation Laboratory: http://vcuarchaeology3d.wordpress.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment