The State Museum of Pennsylvania’s Section of Archaeology
invites you to join us October 29, 2016 for our annual Workshops in Archaeology
program. The theme of this year’s
presentations is Native American symbolism in artifacts and on the cultural landscape. As always the program is designed to offer an
overview of archaeological research and discoveries to the general public.
Anthropologists have long examined symbols created by past
cultures as a way of interpreting and understanding social, political or
individual expression. These take the
form of abstract designs and depictions of animal, human and supernatural
figures, frequently in stone and clay. The
arrangement of earthworks and mounds also had meaning to people in the past.
Some of these symbols had religious connotations. Others
represented clans or depicted supernatural beings that required appeasement. Although rarely found at archaeological sites,
symbols on baskets or beadwork on clothing are also expressions of religious
and cultural beliefs. Some designs may have
been simply decorative art. Whatever the
case, they are reflections of how people perceived and organized their world. Symbolic artifacts recovered from the
archaeological record provide a unique resource for examining past cultural
behavior. Eight presenters will examine
the archaeological evidence of symbolism in Native American cultures and offer
insights into their interpretations.
2016 ANNUAL WORKSHOPS IN ARCHAEOLOGY PROGRAM
Session Descriptions:
All sessions listed below will be held in the Auditorium of
the State Museum
9:00 – 9:10 a.m.
Opening remarks –Beth Hager, Acting Director, The State Museum of
Pennsylvania
9:10-9:50 a.m. Session
1 Petroglyphs in Pennsylvania
–On the Rocks at
Parkers Landing
Kenneth Burkett
Executive Director, Jefferson County History Center, Brookville PA
North Fork Chapter 29 of the Society for Pennsylvania Archaeology
The few accessible petroglyph sites in Pennsylvania are the only intact
locations where evidence intentionally left by the early Native Americans can
be viewed and contemplated in their unaltered natural setting. Among
these, the Parkers Landing Petroglyphs (36CL1) stands out as the most
intensively utilized rock art location known within the upper Allegheny River
basin. The quantity, variable styles and assortment of figures at Parkers
Landing suggests that this location was utilized over a long period of time
possibly beginning in the Middle Woodland period and extending into the 18th
century. But why were they created?
This presentation will include an updated review of this important site
and discuss its figural groupings, possible usage and apparent relationship to
other regional petroglyph sites.
And
The
Safe Harbor Petroglyphs
–Looking for Meaning
Paul Nevin
Rock Art Researcher & Authority on Lower Susquehanna River Rock Art
The Petroglyphs at Safe Harbor, Lancaster County, PA have evoked wonder
for more than 150 years. These rock carvings have often been described as
“enigmatic” - difficult or impossible to interpret or understand. Is it indeed
impossible, or can we begin to get a sense of their purpose and
meaning? Since first visiting the
petroglyphs in the 1980’s a fascination and desire to understand their meaning
has been a challenging task that has often been met with skepticism. “How
can we ever know what was in the minds of the ancient people who created these
images?” Their possible meaning as
theorized by Nevin will be presented along with evidence to support them.
9:50-10:20 a.m. Session 2
Stone Landscapes in
Pennsylvania and
the
Northeast
Daniel Cassidy, AECOM
Jesse Bergevin , Oneida Indian Nation
Christopher Bergman, AECOM
The Stone Landscapes of Pennsylvania and adjoining Northeastern states
are typically composed of well-crafted stone cairns, casual rock piles, and
rock walls, as well as a variety of other dry-laid stone features. Stone Landscapes are a matter of continuing
scholarly debate as to their origin, period of construction, and purpose. This paper discusses a number of locations in
Pennsylvania and New York and presents data on geographic setting, morphology,
methods of construction, and site-specific and regional spatial
patterning. Various theories regarding
their origins are reviewed with an aim to better understanding these enigmatic
landscape features, probably resulting from both Native American and
Euroamerican activities.
10:20-10:40 a.m. Break
coffee and snacks
10:40-11:20 a.m. Session 3 Ohio
Hopewell: Bridging
the Sacred and Profane
Paul Pacheco
Associate Professor & Chair
Department of Anthropology
SUNY Geneseo
Department of Anthropology
SUNY Geneseo
The central mystery in understanding the construction and use of the
great Central Ohio earthworks and mounds during the Middle Woodland Period is
how and why would low density tribal populations, reliant to a large degree on
fluctuating natural resources, expend so much energy on what most would
classify as ceremonial behavior? This presentation attempts to provide an
answer to this question by integrating what we know about Ohio Hopewell
settlement and subsistence practices with current attempts to understand the
cultural meaning served by the earthwork/mound centers. My perspective is
both multi-scalar and landscape focused, looking at symbolism from household to
inter-regional scales. My goal will be to provide a bridge across
the sacred and profane dichotomy which has come to dominate Ohio Hopewell
archaeology in recent decades.
11:20 a.m-12:00 p.m Session 4 Burial Ceremonialism at
Sugar Run Mound (36WA359),
a Hopewellian Squawkie Hill
Phase Site, Warren
County, Pennsylvania
Mark McConaughy, Preservation Specialist
Pennsylvania State Historic
Preservation Office
Sugar Run Mound (36WA359) is a Squawkie Hill phase Hopewellian burial
mound located in Warren County, Pennsylvania. There were three separate periods
of mound burial construction at this site. The earliest burial phase included
production of two effigies of a bird and possible celt/ax made from large stone
cobbles, on two sides of a central cobble cist. Multiple cremations were
interred under the bird effigy of Mound Unit 1. Mound Unit 2 consisted of two
stone box tombs each containing an extended burial with some secondary burials
placed around them. Mound Unit 3 had an extended burial laid on the existing
ground surface. The different modes of burial and associated grave goods
indicate the function of Sugar Run Mound changed through time. This
presentation explores those changes.
12:00–1:15 p.m. Lunch (on your own) - see order form for box lunch option
1:15-1:55 p.m. Session 5 Shell
Effigies and Animal
Symbolism in Delaware
Burial
Ritual
R. Dustin Cushman
Adjunct Professor of Anthropology
Rowan University
This presentation examines the use of effigy grave goods within the
context of burial rituals in the Delaware Valley and adjacent regions. Burial
ritual among the Delaware evolved from pre-contact forms (before 1620 A.D.) to
reinforce group cooperation and network creation during contact times when such
behaviors and systems would have been advantageous. Shell effigy beads and
pendants tend to be the most abundant forms of animal symbolism found, though
effigy pipes, turtle shell rattles, bear teeth and antler headdresses are also
present. Many of the animals selected appear in Delaware stories of creation
and death; and therefore may symbolize life, death, and the liminality of the
in between.
1:55-2:35 p.m. Session 6 Effigies
of the Susquehannock
Janet R. Johnson
Curator, The State Museum of Pennsylvania
The Susquehannock Indians who lived in the Lower Susquehanna River from
about 1575 AD to 1763 are often identified with distinct attributes of ceramic
production. Their ceramics have been
examined and classified by several archaeologists in developing a typology of
Susquehannock pottery attributes. The
Washington Boro phase of the Susquehannock sequence which dates from
approximately 1610-1630 AD exhibits the greatest number of effigy symbols.
Researchers have examined the patterns and placement of effigies on pottery as
an expression of social change or acculturation. This presentation will focus on the
complexity of these design elements, examining patterns for indicators of
individuality or replication across multiple Susquehannock sites.
2:35-3:15 p.m. Session 7 Powerful Pipes: Base Metal
Smoking Pipes of the 17th
and 18th Centuries
Rich Veit
Professor and Chair
Monmouth University
Tobacco pipes are among the most personal and intimate of
artifacts. Archaeologists have found
them to be valuable tools for dating sites, tracking trade networks, and
examining social groupings. This
presentation examines an unusual subset of tobacco pipes, the base metal
smoking pipes used and possibly made by Native American peoples in the
Northeast in the 17th and 18th centuries. Ranging from miniscule to massive, these
pipes, which often bear elaborate ornamentation, are found across much of
eastern North America. It concludes that
metal tobacco pipes were part of a broader suite of artifacts used during the
Contact Period that reflect a melding of Old and New World traditions.
3:15-3:30 p.m. Break coffee
and snacks
3:30-4:10 p.m. Session 8 Beadwork Designs
Rosemary Hill
Beaver Clan and member of the Tuscarora Nation
This presenter will share beadwork designs and techniques of raised
beadwork as taught within the Tuscarora community. Traditional designs were acquired through
generations from mother, grandmother, great-aunt and several other Tuscarora
women beadwork teachers. The session will highlight these beading techniques
along with the reason and meaning of patterns, and variety of family
connection that the beading brings to the generations of our people.
The women of the Tuscarora Nation have preserved their gift of beading
by teaching to members in the community, as well as generations of their
own families. This session will feature pieces of original Tuscarora bead work
examples as well as examples created by the artist.
4:10-4:50 p.m. Conclusions/Closing Summary
William Engelbrecht
Professor Emeritus
SUNY/Buffalo State
We are often reluctant to study symbols of the past since we can never
know with certainty the complexity of meaning with which they were imbued. Yet,
Native Americans were and are spiritual people. When we who study the Native
past fail to acknowledge this and ignore possible spiritual symbolism, our
reconstruction of this past is impoverished. However, uncritical projection of
contemporary beliefs and concerns into the past must be avoided. An approach
which weighs multiple lines of evidence including Native oral tradition should
be encouraged in assessing the possible meaning of past symbols.
4:50 – 5:00 p.m. Closing Comments - questions and discussion
5:00 – 6:00 p.m. Social in the Hall of Anthropology and Archaeology, Second
Floor
In addition to the presentations, attendees can share their
archaeological discoveries with staff from the State Historic Preservation
Office who will provide assistance with identifying artifacts and recording
archaeological sites, essential tasks for protecting and preserving our
archaeological heritage. An additional offering includes a demonstration by a
master flintknapper who will make stone tools using Native American techniques.
A reception at the close of the sessions will provide an opportunity for the
attendees to meet with the presenters and staff in the Anthropology and Archaeology
Gallery of The State Museum.
9:00 a.m. – 4:00
p.m Flint Knapping
Demonstration
–Auditorium Foyer
Steve Nissly
This presentation will feature an expert flintknapper who
will demonstrate how stone tools were made during the Prehistoric and Contact
periods in Pennsylvania.
9:00 a.m. - 4:00
p.m Site Recording in Cultural
Resources Geographic Information
System-Susquehanna Room
Noel Strattan
State Historic Preservation Office
Recording of archaeological sites is an essential task in protecting
and preserving our archaeological resources.
1:10 p.m. – 3:30 p.m. Artifact Identification –Susquehanna Room
Doug McLearen and Kira Heinrich
State Historic Preservation Office
These individuals have over 50 years of combined experience with
archaeological artifacts. Bring in your
historic or prehistoric artifacts for identification and analyses by the
experts.
More information and registration information can be found in the 2016
Archaeology Workshops brochure or by contacting Kurt Carr at kcarr@pa.gov. There is a registration fee to attend this
event.
|
For more information, visit PAarchaeology.state.pa.us or the Hall of Anthropology and Archaeology at The State Museum of Pennsylvania .
No comments:
Post a Comment